Legislature(1995 - 1996)

02/27/1995 01:05 PM House JUD

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
 HJUD - 02/27/95                                                               
 HB 158 - CIVIL LIABILITY                                                    
                                                                               
 Number 360                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER, sponsor of the bill, stated he would explain it,             
 section by section.  He explained that a tort is a private or civil           
 wrong.  It occurs as a result of an act or omission for which a               
 civil suit can be brought.  It involves almost everything, except             
 crimes.  He informed the committee members they were free to stop             
 him to ask questions.  He described what is in the Sectional                  
 Summary, beginning with Section 2:                                            
                                                                               
 "GENERAL STATUTE OF REPOSE:  A law that prevents suits from being             
 brought after a certain period of time, regardless of whether or              
 not the statute of limitations has expired.  Statutes of repose               
 begin running when a product is sold or a procedure is performed,             
 instead of at the time an injury is discovered.                               
                                                                               
 "The purpose of this section is to make it clear that legal actions           
 involving personal injury, death, or property damage must be                  
 brought within a fair and reasonable time.  All crimes have a                 
 statute of limitations in our legal code.  The same standard of               
 fairness should also apply to civil lawsuits.                                 
                                                                               
 "This section is considered a statute of repose, prescribing an               
 eight year period within which any civil action involving injury,             
 death, or property damage must be filed with the courts.  The time            
 period is measured from the date the construction was completed or            
 the last act that allegedly caused the harm.                                  
                                                                               
 "The eight year period would not apply if the injury, death,                  
 property damage was caused by an intentional act or if there was              
 intentional concealment of facts that resulted in a delay of over             
 eight years before the basis for legal action was known.  This                
 section does apply if a shorter period of time for bringing a                 
 particular legal action imposed under another provision of law                
 applies.  The terms for completed construction are defined and                
 clarified so as not to be misinterpreted by litigants or courts."             
                                                                               
 Number 550                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE TOOHEY asked about DES, a fertility drug given to              
 mothers in the 1950s.                                                         
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER said the statute of repose previously addressed               
 product liability.  There is some specific language that was in the           
 bill last year regarding product liability which we have taken out.           
 There was also, under Section 2, "The last act alleged to have                
 caused the personal injury, death, or property damage..."  could              
 allude to a general statement on product liability, and that is not           
 our intent.  The amendment he would offer later on will take that             
 out.  This applies to construction and medical cases, but not to              
 product liability.                                                            
                                                                               
 Number 575                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE FINKELSTEIN asked about a situation under Section 2,           
 where, perhaps a building is constructed over four years, and the             
 act alleged to have caused personal injury is the faulty pouring of           
 the concrete.  It sounds like Section 1 applies to a building, does           
 Section 2 apply as well?  In this case, it would not be eight years           
 from completion of the building, it would be only five years from             
 completion of the building.                                                   
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER answered that the substantial completion of the               
 construction would be the specific qualification for the time that            
 would start any construction claim; not when the subcontractor has            
 done things prior to the substantial completion.                              
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER continued, "Section 3, LIMITATION ON ACTIONS                  
 AGAINST HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS:  A law that requires lawsuits to               
 begin within a specified time period from when the plaintiffs knew            
 they were injured.  When the statute of limitations has expired,              
 the lawsuit can no longer be brought.                                         
                                                                               
 "Under current law, in medical malpractice claims, one may file a             
 claim within two years upon discovering the injury.  This section             
 states that the two-year limitation does not apply to minors under            
 the age of six.  Minors must bring legal actions within two years             
 or before their eighth birthday - whichever is longer.  Tolling of            
 the time limitation provides additional protection for minors.  The           
 clock stops, if fraud by a parent, guardian, insurer, or health               
 provider, is the reason action was not taken.  Time is also                   
 extended for minors if there was an intentional concealment of                
 facts, or the undiscovered presence of a foreign body with no                 
 therapeutic or diagnostic purpose, provided this specification                
 applies to the legal action being brought.                                    
                                                                               
 "The third part of this amendment defines terms to ensure that the            
 statute is understood and applied fairly."                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER then went on to explain that the eight years                  
 statute of repose would apply to a situation where a foreign body,            
 such as a forceps, is left inside of a person's rib cage during               
 surgery.  He continued, "Section 4, CERTAIN STATUTORY LIABILITIES             
 TO BE BROUGHT IN TWO YEARS:  This section removes unclear and                 
 conflicting language from the statute.  The existing two-year limit           
 for actions involving libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction,            
 or false imprisonment remains the same.                                       
                                                                               
 "Section 5,  GENERAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS:  This section places             
 a two-year limit on actions involving injury, death, or property              
 damage after the date claimants could reasonably believe they had             
 a claim.                                                                      
                                                                               
 "It requires that a person commence a civil action for personal               
 injury, death, or property damage within two years of the time the            
 person knows or should have known of the injury, death or damage.             
 It provides that this section does not apply if a shorter period of           
 time is required under another provision of law."                             
                                                                               
 Number 675                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE FINKELSTEIN asked what the definition for "accrual             
 of action" was.                                                               
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER answered "accrual of action" is a common legal                
 term, that is defined in statute.                                             
                                                                               
 Number 685                                                                    
                                                                               
 ANNE CARPENETI, Committee Aide, said it is defined in Title 9.                
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER said "Section 6, NONECONOMIC DAMAGES:  Money                  
 awarded that does not compensate the injured person for monetary              
 loss, but rather, for example, for pain and suffering.                        
                                                                               
 "Economic damages:  Money awarded to an injured person to                     
 compensate for his or her actual monetary loss.  For example,                 
 economic damages compensate for medical costs and lost wages.                 
                                                                               
 "This section extends the definition for noneconomic losses to                
 include claims for wrongful death as well as personal injury.  The            
 definition is clarified by removing "negligence" which is difficult           
 to establish or disprove.  The change further defines noneconomic             
 losses to include loss of consortium, (i.e., the right to a                   
 husband's or wife's fellowship).                                              
                                                                               
 "This section provides that damages for noneconomic losses are                
 limited to certain types of injuries, such as pain and suffering;             
 limits damages for noneconomic losses to $300,000, except that                
 damages are limited to $500,000 for certain specified injuries;               
 provides an exception for damages awarded against a person                    
 committing or attempting to commit a felony; provides that multiple           
 injuries sustained as a result of a single incident shall be                  
 treated as a single injury for the purpose of this section."                  
                                                                               
 Number 765                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER continued, "Section 7, PUNITIVE DAMAGES:  Sometimes           
 called exemplary damages, punitive damages are awarded in to punish           
 a defendant for a malicious, intentional act rather than one that             
 is merely negligent.                                                          
                                                                               
 "The current statute allows punitive damages to be awarded when               
 there is `clear and convincing evidence,' but, does not explain               
 evidence in what actions.  This section requires that punitive                
 damages may not be awarded unless malice or conscious acts showing            
 deliberate disregard of another person by the person from whom the            
 punitive damages are sought is shown.                                         
                                                                               
 "Section 8, LIMIT OF PUNITIVE DAMAGE AWARD:  Any awards for                   
 punitive damages will be at most $300,000 or up to three times the            
 amount of compensatory damages awarded.  Further, one-half of the             
 award will be deposited into the general fund of the state.                   
                                                                               
 "Section 9, DAMAGE CALCULATION:  The term `death' is added so that            
 the statute applies to damages awarded for legal actions involving            
 both personal injury and death.                                               
                                                                               
 "The added text states that after past and future economic and                
 noneconomic losses have been calculated by the court, the amount of           
 state and federal taxes that would have been paid is subtracted               
 from the award.  The amount of tax should be calculated using the             
 state and federal tax rate at the time of the injury or death.                
                                                                               
 "IRS code 104(A)(2) allows income from awards involving personal              
 injury or death to be exempt.  Under current statutes, awards are             
 calculated as the gross loss to the claimant.  Therefore, the                 
 prevailing party is awarded their actual past and projected loss,             
 plus the amount they would have paid in taxes under normal                    
 circumstances.  Claimants are being compensated as if future                  
 earnings were tax exempt.                                                     
                                                                               
 "This section ensures that the prevailing party is fairly                     
 compensated for actual after-tax losses.  Specifying how the tax              
 rates should be calculated removes the need to speculate how much             
 future taxes will be and prevents future litigation for award                 
 adjustments."                                                                 
                                                                               
 TAPE 95-18, SIDE A                                                            
 Number 000                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER said, "Section 10,  PERIODIC PAYMENTS:  Under a               
 periodic payment system, lawsuit awards are paid to the plaintiff             
 throughout his or her lifetime, for the period of disability or for           
 any other set period, instead of a lump sum.                                  
                                                                               
 "This section changes the phrase `an injured party' to `a party.'             
 This allows anyone involved in the suit, rather than just the                 
 claimant, to request periodic payments for amounts awarded for                
 future damages.                                                               
                                                                               
 "Requires that future economic and noneconomic damages that exceed            
 $100,000 be paid periodically whether or not it is requested by a             
 party.  Provides that a portion of a judgment owed to an attorney             
 under a contingent fee agreement, must be reduced to present value            
 and paid in a lump sum."                                                      
                                                                               
 Number 070                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN asked about the possible scenario where there            
 is going to be $100,001 payment over a three year period, and the             
 attorney's fee is one-third.  If you discount the second and third            
 year to the present, it is conceivable that the awardee would be              
 out for almost his first year's compensation.  Because a third of             
 that is brought forward to the second and third year, according to            
 the way this is written.                                                      
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER said the attorney's fee is taken out of the award,            
 reduced to present value, and given to the attorney.  Still you are           
 right.  If, for example, there were a three-year award of $50,000             
 each, that would be $150,000 due the plaintiff.  If the contingent            
 fee was 50 percent, which is quite high, but if it were, that would           
 reduce it to $75,000, and that is what would be spread out over               
 three years.  The $75,000 would be given to the attorney in a lump            
 sum, while the remaining $75,000 would be spread out over a three             
 year period to the plaintiff.                                                 
                                                                               
 Number 175                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER explained "Section 11, SECURITY FOR PERIODIC                  
 PAYMENTS:  Requires that the court require security be posted for             
 periodic payments, except when the obligation is recognized by the            
 state or an insurer.  Requires that the judgment include increases            
 for future anticipated inflation.  Provides to the judgment                   
 creditor damages caused by the failure to make periodic payments,             
 including costs and attorney fees.                                            
                                                                               
 "Section 12, INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR PERIODIC PAYMENTS:  The                
 words `for personal injury or death' are added to the statute.                
 This section clarifies what types of damage awards are being                  
 regulated by this statute.                                                    
                                                                               
 "Courts must specify the percentage or the method for increases by            
 future periodic payments will increase to cover inflation.                    
                                                                               
 "By specifying the amount or method allowed for inflation, the                
 amendment prevents future litigation for an adjustment of the                 
 original award.                                                               
                                                                               
 Number 300                                                                    
                                                                               
 "Section 13, COLLATERAL BENEFITS:  A trial where the jury is not              
 told that the injured person has received money for their injury              
 from other sources, such as an insurance policy or another                    
 defendant.                                                                    
                                                                               
 "This prevents unjust enrichment from claimants who collect                   
 multiple awards for the same loss.                                            
                                                                               
 "Prohibits a claimant from recovering damages that duplicate                  
 amounts received from collateral sources.  Provides exceptions for            
 certain collateral sources that are subrogated to the claimant, and           
 for death benefits and workers' compensation benefits.  Allows a              
 person defending a claim to introduce evidence of amounts received            
 from certain collateral sources.  Prohibits a person who provides             
 a collateral benefit that is introduced into evidence from                    
 recovering that amount from the claimant or being subrogated the              
 rights of the claimant.                                                       
                                                                               
 Number 360                                                                    
                                                                               
 "Section 14, APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT:  Provides that the court shall           
 determine each party's equitable share of the obligation to each              
 claimant.  Provides that assessment may only be used to measure               
 percentages of fault and not to subject a person to civil                     
 liability.                                                                    
                                                                               
 "The word `party' creates a loophole that restricts apportionment             
 of fault to those named in the legal action.  By considering all              
 persons or entities which contributed to a loss, each is fairly               
 apportioned a degree of fault based on their own actions.                     
                                                                               
 "Thus, this section provides that the court shall determine each              
 party's equitable share of the obligation to each claimant.                   
 Provides that an assessment may only be used to measure percentages           
 of fault and not to subject a person to civil liability.                      
                                                                               
 "Section 15, APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT:  Changes the statute number to           
 conform with revised law and clarifies the rules so that all                  
 parties that contributed to injury or death are fairly considered             
 when assessing the percentage of fault.                                       
                                                                               
 "Section 16, EFFECT OF RELEASE:  Provides that a release given in             
 good faith does not discharge another person from liability, but              
 does reduce the total amount awarded by the jury or court by the              
 amount stipulated in the release or the consideration paid for it,            
 whichever is greater.                                                         
                                                                               
 Number 450                                                                    
                                                                               
 "Section 17, OFFERS OF JUDGMENT:  The existing statute says that              
 prior to 10 days before trial begins, either party can make an                
 offer to settle a claim, plus accrued costs.  This must be accepted           
 within 10 days and correctly recorded by the clerk.                           
                                                                               
 "If the court's judgment is less favorable to the recipient of the            
 offer, the person who refused the offer must pay the offerer's                
 costs and attorney fees incurred since the date when the higher               
 offer to settle was made."                                                    
                                                                               
 Number 520                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE FINKELSTEIN felt this provision would cover                    
 unreasonable offers as well as reasonable offers.                             
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE VEZEY agreed the wording was vague.                            
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER continued, "Section 18, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST:  The            
 section changes the interest rates on judgments and decrees from a            
 set 10.5 percent a year to a floating rate of 3 percent above the             
 federal discount rate in effect January 2nd of the year of the                
 judgment.  This rate is not used if a different rate has previously           
 been agreed to by contract.                                                   
                                                                               
 "Federal discount rates have been as low as 1 percent (1942) and as           
 high as 14 percent (1981).  Allowing annual adjustments for                   
 prejudgment interest brings charges in line with the current market           
 and prevents unfairly high or low rates.                                      
                                                                               
 "Provides that the rate of interest on judgments and decrees,                 
 including prejudgment interest, is equal to prejudgment interest              
 for certain future damages or punitive damages.                               
                                                                               
 "Section 19, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST:  The purpose for the prejudgment           
 interest is to allow claimants reimbursement of funds that would              
 normally have been in their possession plus any interest that                 
 amount could have earned prior to the trial.  This is not the case            
 in damages awarded for future losses and these sums can be invested           
 and interest earned on the funds.                                             
                                                                               
 "Prejudgment interest is subject to federal income tax and attorney           
 fees commission.                                                              
                                                                               
 "Section 20, UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT:  Amends the section on                  
 application of the Uniform Arbitration Act so that it applies to              
 the statutes as listed after adoption of House Bill 158.                      
                                                                               
 "Section 21, MEDICAL EXPERT WITNESS QUALIFICATION:  This section              
 establishes qualifications for an expert witness to testify on                
 issues relating to appropriate medical standard of care unless the            
 witness is a health care provider.                                            
                                                                               
 "MEDICAL BOARD OVERSIGHT OF MEDICAL EXPERT WITNESSES:  Establishes            
 guidelines for the court as to when to allow a medical expert                 
 witness to testify in cross-examination.                                      
                                                                               
 "Section 22, DEFINITIONS:  Provides definitions for professional              
 negligence and professional services.                                         
                                                                               
 "Section 23, CONTINGENT ATTORNEY FEE AGREEMENTS:  Provides that if            
 an attorney collects a contingency fee in connection with an award            
 of punitive damages, the contingent fee due the attorney shall be             
 calculated after that portion of punitive damages due the state has           
 been deducted from the total award of damages.                                
                                                                               
 Number 530                                                                    
                                                                               
 "Section 24, CIVIL LIABILITY OF HOSPITALS FOR NON EMPLOYEES:  The             
 purpose of this section is to clarify the circumstances in which              
 hospitals are held directly liable for the actions of health care             
 providers not employed by the hospital.  Current law permits                  
 claimants to sue only the hospital rather than the independent                
 contractor who may have less ability to pay.                                  
                                                                               
 "Provides that a hospital is not liable for civil damages resulting           
 from an act or omission by a health care provider who is not an               
 employee or actual agent of the hospital.  However, the hospital              
 must provide notice that the health care provider is an independent           
 contractor and a notice of limited liability must be posted in all            
 admissions areas and published in area newspapers annually.                   
                                                                               
 "The hospitals must also use caution and prudence in granting                 
 privileges to independent health care providers, have a review                
 proceeding to monitor independent contractors, and be prepared to             
 revoke or restrict privileges when needed.                                    
                                                                               
 "Hospitals are liable for civil damages if the hospital or its                
 employees were negligent or acted with intentional misconduct.                
                                                                               
 "The final section defines health care providers and hospitals as             
 the terms are used in this statute.                                           
                                                                               
 Number 610                                                                    
                                                                               
 "Section 25, DAMAGES RESULTING FROM COMMISSION OF A CRIME:                    
 Provides that a person committing, attempting to commit, or fleeing           
 from the commission of a felony whose action substantially                    
 contributed to the person's injury or death, is prohibited from               
 recovering damages from personal injury or death.                             
                                                                               
 "Section 26, SIGNING OF PLEADINGS, MOTIONS, AND OTHER PAPERS;                 
 SANCTIONS:  Sanctions for failure to sign a pleading or filing a              
 frivolous lawsuit is a matter in the discretion of the trial court.           
 This section imposes monetary sanctions against any attorney in               
 civil cases from filing frivolous, unnecessary and legally                    
 deficient pleadings.                                                          
                                                                               
 "If it is alleged or appears that a pleading, motion, or other                
 paper is signed in violation of this section, the court, upon                 
 motion or upon its own initiative, may set the matter for hearing.            
 If the court determines that the motion is in violation, monetary             
 sanctions will be implemented.                                                
                                                                               
 Number 640                                                                    
                                                                               
 "Section 27, Repealing AS 09.55.548.                                          
                                                                               
 "Section 28 through 33, Technical sections relating to amending               
 Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 49.68.702 and 95.                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
 "Section 34,  Severability.                                                   
                                                                               
 "Section 35, This Act applies to all causes of action accruing on             
 or after the effective date of this Act.                                      
                                                                               
 "Section 36, This Act takes effect July 1, 1995."                             
                                                                               
 Number 650                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN PORTER stated the work session on HB 158 was over, and on            
 Wednesday, March 1, the bill would be open to public testimony.               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects